Table 2 Instance-level results
From: Pedestrian segmentation based on a spatio-temporally consistent graph-cut with optimal transport
| Â | TUD-Stadtmitte | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | M. IoU [%] | W. IoU [%] | M. IoU B [%] | Time [min] |
Ochs’s | 13.19 | 25.96 | 3.39 | 1255 |
Milan’s | 50.97 | 44.80 | 20.70 | 209 |
He’s | 70.36 | 79.21 | 20.23 | 0.5 |
Proposed | 57.48 | 81.12 | 20.44 | 17.7 |
| Â | TUD-Campus | |||
| Â | M. IoU [%] | W. IoU [%] | M. IoU B[%] | Time [min] |
Ochs’s | 15.08 | 34.87 | 2.85 | 500 |
Milan’s | 51.38 | 49.29 | 14.27 | 83 |
He’s | 63.92 | 71.54 | 13.04 | 0.2 |
Proposed | 48.08 | 77.89 | 16.85 | 9.6 |
| Â | TUD-Crossing | |||
| Â | M. IoU [%] | W. IoU [%] | M. IoU B [%] | Time [min] |
Ochs’s | 6.5 | 26.65 | 1.50 | 1512 |
Milan’s | 14.30 | 22.87 | 5.89 | 240 |
He’s | 38.00 | 56.17 | 10.08 | 0.65 |
Proposed | 30.83 | 64.18 | 13.54 | 20.5 |
| Â | PETS2009 | |||
| Â | M. IoU [%] | W. IoU [%] | M. IoU B [%] | Time [min] |
Ochs’s | 14.41 | 29.54 | 5.40 | 4355 |
Milan’s | 33.17 | 34.39 | 2.24 | 870 |
He’s | 79.25 | 85.61 | 42.11 | 2.1 |
Proposed | 68.20 | 80.61 | 37.75 | 118 |