Skip to main content

Table 4 Rank 1 identification rate (%) for thinned view angle pairs for a cooperative setting

From: Multi-view large population gait dataset and its performance evaluation for cross-view gait recognition

(a)VTM (b)wQVTM
  Probe    Probe  
Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean
0 68.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 17.4 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
30 0.7 82.2 2.1 0.8 21.4 30 0.0 81.7 0.0 0.8 20.6
60 0.3 3.2 77.6 5.4 21.6 60 0.0 0.0 78.0 0.0 19.5
90 0.2 1.1 4.2 80.9 21.6 90 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mean 17.5 21.7 21.0 21.8 20.5 Mean 0.0 20.4 19.5 0.2 10.0
(c)LDA (d)1in-GEINet
  Probe    Probe  
Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean
0 70.0 3.2 0.3 0.2 18.4 0 75.9 32.1 7.0 7.4 30.6
30 4.6 87.1 11.1 1.9 26.2 30 17.3 89.6 43.7 22.7 43.3
60 0.3 9.3 83.3 19.5 28.1 60 4.0 43.4 86.5 55.4 47.3
90 0.1 0.6 12.6 85.9 24.8 90 3.4 21.5 50.2 90.7 41.5
Mean 18.7 25.0 26.8 26.9 24.4 Mean 25.2 46.6 46.8 44.0 40.7
(e) Siamese (f) MT
  Probe    Probe  
Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean
0 52.7 23.7 11.1 11.3 24.7 0 70.7 16.7 4.4 3.9 23.9
30 18.4 78.6 32.6 27.6 39.3 30 14.1 88.1 36.9 17.0 39.0
60 8.0 33.5 76.1 39.6 39.3 60 4.0 39.2 85.7 44.2 43.3
90 7.9 26.5 36.5 82.1 38.2 90 3.2 16.2 43.4 89.3 38.0
Mean 21.8 40.6 39.1 40.1 35.4 Mean 23.0 40.0 42.6 38.6 36.1
(g) LB (h) DM
  Probe    Probe  
Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean Gallery 0 30 60 90 Mean
0 74.4 16.5 3.5 2.8 24.3 0 68.8 0.8 0.1 0.0 17.4
30 13.6 89.3 36.0 16.2 38.8 30 1.2 82.2 1.4 0.3 21.3
60 2.9 36.2 88.4 44.7 43.0 60 0.1 1.1 77.5 5.6 21.1
90 2.2 14.0 41.2 91.7 37.3 90 0.0 0.2 4.1 80.9 21.3
Mean 23.3 39.0 42.3 38.9 35.9 Mean 17.5 21.1 20.8 21.7 20.3