Table 4 Rank 1 identification rate (%) for thinned view angle pairs for a cooperative setting

From: Multi-view large population gait dataset and its performance evaluation for cross-view gait recognition

(a)VTM						(b)wQVTM
	Probe						Probe
Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean	Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean
0	68.8	0.5	0.2	0.1	17.4	0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
30	0.7	82.2	2.1	0.8	21.4	30	0.0	81.7	0.0	0.8	20.6
60	0.3	3.2	77.6	5.4	21.6	60	0.0	0.0	78.0	0.0	19.5
90	0.2	1.1	4.2	80.9	21.6	90	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Mean	17.5	21.7	21.0	21.8	20.5	Mean	0.0	20.4	19.5	0.2	10.0
(c)LDA						(d)1in-GEINet
	Probe						Probe
Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean	Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean
0	70.0	3.2	0.3	0.2	18.4	0	75.9	32.1	7.0	7.4	30.6
30	4.6	87.1	11.1	1.9	26.2	30	17.3	89.6	43.7	22.7	43.3
60	0.3	9.3	83.3	19.5	28.1	60	4.0	43.4	86.5	55.4	47.3
90	0.1	0.6	12.6	85.9	24.8	90	3.4	21.5	50.2	90.7	41.5
Mean	18.7	25.0	26.8	26.9	24.4	Mean	25.2	46.6	46.8	44.0	40.7
(e) Siamese						(f) MT
	Probe						Probe
Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean	Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean
0	52.7	23.7	11.1	11.3	24.7	0	70.7	16.7	4.4	3.9	23.9
30	18.4	78.6	32.6	27.6	39.3	30	14.1	88.1	36.9	17.0	39.0
60	8.0	33.5	76.1	39.6	39.3	60	4.0	39.2	85.7	44.2	43.3
90	7.9	26.5	36.5	82.1	38.2	90	3.2	16.2	43.4	89.3	38.0
Mean	21.8	40.6	39.1	40.1	35.4	Mean	23.0	40.0	42.6	38.6	36.1
(g) LB						(h) DM
	Probe						Probe
Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean	Gallery	0	30	60	90	Mean
0	74.4	16.5	3.5	2.8	24.3	0	68.8	0.8	0.1	0.0	17.4
30	13.6	89.3	36.0	16.2	38.8	30	1.2	82.2	1.4	0.3	21.3
60	2.9	36.2	88.4	44.7	43.0	60	0.1	1.1	77.5	5.6	21.1
90	2.2	14.0	41.2	91.7	37.3	90	0.0	0.2	4.1	80.9	21.3
Mean	23.3	39.0	42.3	38.9	35.9	Mean	17.5	21.1	20.8	21.7	20.3

Back to article page