Skip to main content

Table 13 Gender classification results

From: Effective hyperparameter optimization using Nelder-Mead method in deep learning

Method

Mean loss

Min loss

Random search

0.001732 (±0.000540)

0.000984

Bayesian optimization

0.00183 (±0.000547)

0.001097

CMA-ES

0.001804 (±0.000480)

0.001249

Coordinate-search method

0.002240 (±0.001448)

0.000378

Nelder-Mead method

0.000395 (±0.000129)

0.000245

Method

Mean accuracy (%)

Accuracy with min loss (%)

Random search

87.93 (±0.24)

88.21

Bayesian optimization

88.07 (±0.27)

87.85

CMA-ES

88.20 (±0.38)

88.55

Coordinate-search method

87.04 (±0.52)

87.72

Nelder-Mead method

88.38 (±0.47)

88.83

  1. The smallest loss for each experiment is indicated by bold-faced font