Table 3 Performance evaluation of symbol spotting approaches on SESYD
From: Symbol spotting for architectural drawings: state-of-the-art and new industry-driven developments
Method | P(%) | R(%) | F | AveP (%) | T (s) | Subset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nguyen et al. [22] | 70.00 | 88.00 | 79.50 | – | – | 6 queries in 15 images from SESYD |
Broelemann et al. [33] | 75.17 | 93.17 | 83.21 | – | – | SESYD (floorplan16-01, floorplan16-05, floorplan16-06) |
Le Bodic et al. [36] | 90.00 | 81.00 | 85.30 | – | – | 16 queries in 200 architectural plans from SESYD |
Nayef and Breuel [57] | 98.90 | 98.10 | 98.50 | – | – | 12 queries in 20 architectural plan from SESYD |
Dutta et al. [38] | 62.33 | 95.67 | 75.50 | 70.66 | 0.57 | SESYD (floorplans16-01) |
Dutta et al. [65] | 56.92 | 83.96 | 67.85 | 60.87 | 0.07 | SESYD |
Dutta et al. [67] | 50.32 | 83.06 | 62.67 | 60.87 | 0.07 | SESYD |